<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for qwstnevrythg.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://qwstnevrythg.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://qwstnevrythg.com</link>
	<description>who controls the past controls the future. who controls the present controls the past</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 05:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Secretive Agency Under the Spotlight. Chief Tries to Repair CIA as Scrutiny Grows by Bookmarks about Agency</title>
		<link>http://qwstnevrythg.com/archives/1719#comment-941</link>
		<dc:creator>Bookmarks about Agency</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 14:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qwstnevrythg.com/?p=1719#comment-941</guid>
		<description>[...] 296  http://abbysagency.us/?p=356 - bookmarked by 6 members originally found by ocde on 2008-08-06  Secretive Agency Under the Spotlight. Chief Tries to Repair CIA as ...  http://qwstnevrythg.com/archives/1719 - bookmarked by 2 members originally found by lrstille on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 296  <a href="http://abbysagency.us/?p=356" rel="nofollow">http://abbysagency.us/?p=356</a> - bookmarked by 6 members originally found by ocde on 2008-08-06  Secretive Agency Under the Spotlight. Chief Tries to Repair CIA as &#8230;  <a href="http://qwstnevrythg.com/archives/1719" rel="nofollow">http://qwstnevrythg.com/archives/1719</a> - bookmarked by 2 members originally found by lrstille on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on McCain’s Kyrgyz Connection: The “Freedom House” That Isn’t Free by Tribunus Plebis</title>
		<link>http://qwstnevrythg.com/archives/2119#comment-915</link>
		<dc:creator>Tribunus Plebis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 15:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qwstnevrythg.com/?p=2119#comment-915</guid>
		<description>This story relies too much on speculation and even contains some misinformation. One of its sources for historical background, Justin Raimondo, has for some time has been peddling conspiracy theories alleging CIA or capitalist plots behind various nonviolent revolutions, without much empirical evidence. Like a lot of conspiracy theorists, he's not above connecting people based on common board memberships -- as if plots against Central Asian potentates were being hatched in the men's room at Goldman Sachs.

Also, the article cites Noam Chomsky as its authority for claiming that Freedom House is a "virtual propaganda arm of...the international right wing." The latter would be news to its executive director, who served in the Clinton Administration, as well as Democratic members of the Freedom House board like Stuart Eizenstat (who served in the Carter Administration), Michael McFaul (an advisor to Barack Obama), and Sidney Harman, the husband of Democratic congresswoman Jane Harman. By the way, it was Eleanor Roosevelt and Wendell Wilkie -- both intensely disliked by the right-wingers of their era -- who founded Freedom House. It predates the neo-cons by a half-century and will be around when the neo-cons are long gone.

As for the Bush Administration, it may well have been ambivalent about the fall of Akayev, but the reliable international news outlets did substantial reporting about the "Tulip Revolution," and none found evidence that the kind of chaotic semi-insurrection that happened in Kyrgyzstan could have been neatly engineered by Western democracy promoters. Internal forces largely drive these convulsions, not well-barbered guys wearing ties from inside the Washington Beltway.

This was way too messy a conflict to be likely to yield a scandal that's sufficiently straight-forward to be used in a presidential campaign -- which isn't to say that the story couldn't benefit from additional reporting that produces more reliable information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class='eg-image' style='float:right; margin-left:10px; display:block;; width:80px' ><img alt='' src='http://www.gravatar.com/avatar/cebb2fdb81cf6ac87d72d30fa201633e?s=80&amp;d=http%3A%2F%2Fuse.perl.org%2Fimages%2Fpix.gif&amp;r=X' class='avatar avatar-80' height='80' width='80' /></span>This story relies too much on speculation and even contains some misinformation. One of its sources for historical background, Justin Raimondo, has for some time has been peddling conspiracy theories alleging CIA or capitalist plots behind various nonviolent revolutions, without much empirical evidence. Like a lot of conspiracy theorists, he&#8217;s not above connecting people based on common board memberships &#8212; as if plots against Central Asian potentates were being hatched in the men&#8217;s room at Goldman Sachs.</p>
<p>Also, the article cites Noam Chomsky as its authority for claiming that Freedom House is a &#8220;virtual propaganda arm of&#8230;the international right wing.&#8221; The latter would be news to its executive director, who served in the Clinton Administration, as well as Democratic members of the Freedom House board like Stuart Eizenstat (who served in the Carter Administration), Michael McFaul (an advisor to Barack Obama), and Sidney Harman, the husband of Democratic congresswoman Jane Harman. By the way, it was Eleanor Roosevelt and Wendell Wilkie &#8212; both intensely disliked by the right-wingers of their era &#8212; who founded Freedom House. It predates the neo-cons by a half-century and will be around when the neo-cons are long gone.</p>
<p>As for the Bush Administration, it may well have been ambivalent about the fall of Akayev, but the reliable international news outlets did substantial reporting about the &#8220;Tulip Revolution,&#8221; and none found evidence that the kind of chaotic semi-insurrection that happened in Kyrgyzstan could have been neatly engineered by Western democracy promoters. Internal forces largely drive these convulsions, not well-barbered guys wearing ties from inside the Washington Beltway.</p>
<p>This was way too messy a conflict to be likely to yield a scandal that&#8217;s sufficiently straight-forward to be used in a presidential campaign &#8212; which isn&#8217;t to say that the story couldn&#8217;t benefit from additional reporting that produces more reliable information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Al-Qaeda Expert Killed AGAIN! by Chemical Engineering &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Al-Qaeda Expert Killed AGAIN!</title>
		<link>http://qwstnevrythg.com/archives/2024#comment-907</link>
		<dc:creator>Chemical Engineering &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Al-Qaeda Expert Killed AGAIN!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qwstnevrythg.com/?p=2024#comment-907</guid>
		<description>[...] United States Market Analysis wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerpthttp://www.hotpotatomash.com/… Lori Price at LegitGov.Org points out that Al-Qaeda expert, Abu Khabab al-Masri was killed again by the CIA: Financial Times (July 30, 2008): Pakistan intelligence officials yesterday confirmed a key al-Qaeda expert on chemical and biological weapons was killed in an attack by a CIA-operated unpiloted drone, late on Sunday. ABC News (January 18, 2006): ABC News has learned [&#8230;] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] United States Market Analysis wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerpthttp://www.hotpotatomash.com/… Lori Price at LegitGov.Org points out that Al-Qaeda expert, Abu Khabab al-Masri was killed again by the CIA: Financial Times (July 30, 2008): Pakistan intelligence officials yesterday confirmed a key al-Qaeda expert on chemical and biological weapons was killed in an attack by a CIA-operated unpiloted drone, late on Sunday. ABC News (January 18, 2006): ABC News has learned [&#8230;] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bush, US Military Pressure Iraqis on Withdrawal by xxxevilgrinxxx</title>
		<link>http://qwstnevrythg.com/archives/1975#comment-904</link>
		<dc:creator>xxxevilgrinxxx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qwstnevrythg.com/?p=1975#comment-904</guid>
		<description>I think most of us knew this to be true, Pepe. That the US ALWAYS intended Iraq to be the new base of operations, set in the middle of the Mideast. From there, they can threaten and destabilize Iran, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, you name it. And there's all that oil just waiting there. 

I am amazed by how many people continue to be snowed by that fact though.
The US will NEVER leave the area, at least not willingly
E</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class='eg-image' style='float:right; margin-left:10px; display:block;; width:80px' ><a rel='external nofollow' href='http://qwstnevrythg.com'><img alt='' src='http://www.gravatar.com/avatar/eba730e32cdeec5e4ee4ec5c007c74ed?s=80&amp;d=http%3A%2F%2Fuse.perl.org%2Fimages%2Fpix.gif&amp;r=X' class='avatar avatar-80' height='80' width='80' /></a></span>I think most of us knew this to be true, Pepe. That the US ALWAYS intended Iraq to be the new base of operations, set in the middle of the Mideast. From there, they can threaten and destabilize Iran, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, you name it. And there&#8217;s all that oil just waiting there. </p>
<p>I am amazed by how many people continue to be snowed by that fact though.<br />
The US will NEVER leave the area, at least not willingly<br />
E</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bush, US Military Pressure Iraqis on Withdrawal by PepeLapiu</title>
		<link>http://qwstnevrythg.com/archives/1975#comment-903</link>
		<dc:creator>PepeLapiu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qwstnevrythg.com/?p=1975#comment-903</guid>
		<description>Duh! I could have told you all this some 4 years ago when we all learned that the USA was building the largest ever 'secure' American embassy (secure embassy should read 'military base') in Iraq.

Cheers,
PepeLapiu :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class='eg-image' style='float:right; margin-left:10px; display:block;; width:80px' ><img alt='' src='http://www.gravatar.com/avatar/c49d906d06928ff6e487adb35d61c1b1?s=80&amp;d=http%3A%2F%2Fuse.perl.org%2Fimages%2Fpix.gif&amp;r=X' class='avatar avatar-80' height='80' width='80' /></span>Duh! I could have told you all this some 4 years ago when we all learned that the USA was building the largest ever &#8217;secure&#8217; American embassy (secure embassy should read &#8216;military base&#8217;) in Iraq.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
PepeLapiu <img src='http://qwstnevrythg.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Russia joins the war in Afghanistan by xxxevilgrinxxx</title>
		<link>http://qwstnevrythg.com/archives/1728#comment-868</link>
		<dc:creator>xxxevilgrinxxx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 22:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qwstnevrythg.com/?p=1728#comment-868</guid>
		<description>thanks, Ubiwar!! Just taking a look at CTL now. It looks good, thank you very much for the link!
E.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class='eg-image' style='float:right; margin-left:10px; display:block;; width:80px' ><a rel='external nofollow' href='http://qwstnevrythg.com'><img alt='' src='http://www.gravatar.com/avatar/eba730e32cdeec5e4ee4ec5c007c74ed?s=80&amp;d=http%3A%2F%2Fuse.perl.org%2Fimages%2Fpix.gif&amp;r=X' class='avatar avatar-80' height='80' width='80' /></a></span>thanks, Ubiwar!! Just taking a look at CTL now. It looks good, thank you very much for the link!<br />
E.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Russia joins the war in Afghanistan by ubiwar</title>
		<link>http://qwstnevrythg.com/archives/1728#comment-867</link>
		<dc:creator>ubiwar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 22:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qwstnevrythg.com/?p=1728#comment-867</guid>
		<description>You might be interested to know that Christian Bleuer, whose work Noah Schachtman based his article on, not only blogs at &lt;em&gt;Ghosts of Alexander&lt;/em&gt; but is also a contributor to &lt;a href="http://www.terraplexic.org/review/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Complex Terrain Laboratory&lt;/a&gt;. He's a pretty sharp commentator on Afghanistan.

Disclaimer: I edit CTLab, so I would say that ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class='eg-image' style='float:right; margin-left:10px; display:block;; width:80px' ><img alt='' src='http://www.gravatar.com/avatar/d0ba397976748db92e529db1bb2b2e3d?s=80&amp;d=http%3A%2F%2Fuse.perl.org%2Fimages%2Fpix.gif&amp;r=X' class='avatar avatar-80' height='80' width='80' /></span>You might be interested to know that Christian Bleuer, whose work Noah Schachtman based his article on, not only blogs at <em>Ghosts of Alexander</em> but is also a contributor to <a href="http://www.terraplexic.org/review/" rel="nofollow">Complex Terrain Laboratory</a>. He&#8217;s a pretty sharp commentator on Afghanistan.</p>
<p>Disclaimer: I edit CTLab, so I would say that &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Russia joins the war in Afghanistan by xxxevilgrinxxx</title>
		<link>http://qwstnevrythg.com/archives/1728#comment-850</link>
		<dc:creator>xxxevilgrinxxx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 15:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qwstnevrythg.com/?p=1728#comment-850</guid>
		<description>I don't think that any country that would go into Afghanistan (or Iraq or Iran or Latin America, you get the drift) does it because they are helping. They have weapons and soldiers/mercenaries to trade in. It's no different than any of the other countries currently involved in "helping" in the area. 
Somebody is making a hell of a lot of money, or it wouldn't be done.
E.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class='eg-image' style='float:right; margin-left:10px; display:block;; width:80px' ><a rel='external nofollow' href='http://qwstnevrythg.com'><img alt='' src='http://www.gravatar.com/avatar/eba730e32cdeec5e4ee4ec5c007c74ed?s=80&amp;d=http%3A%2F%2Fuse.perl.org%2Fimages%2Fpix.gif&amp;r=X' class='avatar avatar-80' height='80' width='80' /></a></span>I don&#8217;t think that any country that would go into Afghanistan (or Iraq or Iran or Latin America, you get the drift) does it because they are helping. They have weapons and soldiers/mercenaries to trade in. It&#8217;s no different than any of the other countries currently involved in &#8220;helping&#8221; in the area.<br />
Somebody is making a hell of a lot of money, or it wouldn&#8217;t be done.<br />
E.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Russia joins the war in Afghanistan by scottryan1</title>
		<link>http://qwstnevrythg.com/archives/1728#comment-848</link>
		<dc:creator>scottryan1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 10:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qwstnevrythg.com/?p=1728#comment-848</guid>
		<description>Number 1, Russia is not helping Afghanistan and helping in the war against the Taliban, it is helping its self, that’s unless they are not getting any money for supplying Afghanistan weapons for free, if not and they do get money, it means that they don’t give a sh-t, and only are so called helping for money for more weapon sales.
So what it means is that Russia, need more weapons sales, after china stoped buying so many weapons, so after that, they lost 60% of weapon sales, and will supply any one for money, they are not helping the US in Afghanistan, they are helping sales of weapons to get more money to start up the old Soviet Union, along with all the hi gas / petrol prices and new market. they will slow turn on the west over the next 15 years, &#38; we will see the old cold war times 2,,, china/ Russia twice as bad, then you will see America’s markte full a part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class='eg-image' style='float:right; margin-left:10px; display:block;; width:80px' ><img alt='' src='http://www.gravatar.com/avatar/d373b0977cb2351ef92a7f4f66ab8d72?s=80&amp;d=http%3A%2F%2Fuse.perl.org%2Fimages%2Fpix.gif&amp;r=X' class='avatar avatar-80' height='80' width='80' /></span>Number 1, Russia is not helping Afghanistan and helping in the war against the Taliban, it is helping its self, that’s unless they are not getting any money for supplying Afghanistan weapons for free, if not and they do get money, it means that they don’t give a sh-t, and only are so called helping for money for more weapon sales.<br />
So what it means is that Russia, need more weapons sales, after china stoped buying so many weapons, so after that, they lost 60% of weapon sales, and will supply any one for money, they are not helping the US in Afghanistan, they are helping sales of weapons to get more money to start up the old Soviet Union, along with all the hi gas / petrol prices and new market. they will slow turn on the west over the next 15 years, &amp; we will see the old cold war times 2,,, china/ Russia twice as bad, then you will see America’s markte full a part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Russia joins the war in Afghanistan by scottryan1</title>
		<link>http://qwstnevrythg.com/archives/1728#comment-847</link>
		<dc:creator>scottryan1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 10:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qwstnevrythg.com/?p=1728#comment-847</guid>
		<description>Number 1, Russia is not helping Afghanistan and helping in the war against the Taliban, it is helping its self, that’s  unless they are not getting any money for supplying Afghanistan weapons for free, if not and they do get money, it means that they don’t give a sh-t, and only are so called helping for money for more weapon sales.
So what it means is that Russia, need more weapons sales, after china stoped buying so many weapons, so after that, they lost 60% of weapon sales, and will supply any one for money, they are not helping the US in Afghanistan, they are helping sales of weapons to get more money to start up the old Soviet Union, along with all the hi gas / petrol prices and new market. they will slow turn on the west over the next 15 years, &#38; we will see the old cold war times 2,,, china/ Russia twice as bad, then you will see America’s make full a part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class='eg-image' style='float:right; margin-left:10px; display:block;; width:80px' ><img alt='' src='http://www.gravatar.com/avatar/d373b0977cb2351ef92a7f4f66ab8d72?s=80&amp;d=http%3A%2F%2Fuse.perl.org%2Fimages%2Fpix.gif&amp;r=X' class='avatar avatar-80' height='80' width='80' /></span>Number 1, Russia is not helping Afghanistan and helping in the war against the Taliban, it is helping its self, that’s  unless they are not getting any money for supplying Afghanistan weapons for free, if not and they do get money, it means that they don’t give a sh-t, and only are so called helping for money for more weapon sales.<br />
So what it means is that Russia, need more weapons sales, after china stoped buying so many weapons, so after that, they lost 60% of weapon sales, and will supply any one for money, they are not helping the US in Afghanistan, they are helping sales of weapons to get more money to start up the old Soviet Union, along with all the hi gas / petrol prices and new market. they will slow turn on the west over the next 15 years, &amp; we will see the old cold war times 2,,, china/ Russia twice as bad, then you will see America’s make full a part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
